Sign Up  |  Help  |  Log In
Saturday, July 4, 2009. New Comics were 3 days ago
 
 
All the Comics #11: the Webcomics Cartoonists' Choice Awards
By Shaenon K. Garrity
Thursday March 20, 2008 10:00:00 am
The winners of the 2008 Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards (www.ccawards.com) were recently announced, and I wasn't too horrified, so let's call it a good year. I won a WCCA once (Outstanding Writing for Narbonic), which was nice, but I'm fully aware that they're pretty thoroughly goofy. John Solomon of the delightfully spite-filled blog Your Webcomic Is Bad and You Should Feel Bad (badwebcomics.blogspot.com) called the WCCAs "just an extension of the usual simpering circlejerk that the webcomics 'community' is," and that's pretty accurate. Theoretically, they're more than just fan awards because only webcartoonists can vote in them, but it's not like it's hard to become a webcartoonist. Experts have predicted that by August of this year, every man, woman and child in America and Canada will have a webcomic, and 90% of those webcomics will mention Super Smash Bros. Brawl. So, yeah, they're basically fan awards. But they're all we've got.

Solomon, who's a lot more direct than I am, also notes, "In 2002, Best Comic was judged to be Megatokyo. It also won Best Writing, Best Serial Comic and Best Dramatic Comic. If you won't accept the WCCA as pure shit now, you never will." Things have gotten a little better since then, but the WWCAs are still much less a measure of the best webcomics than they are of the best massively popular webcomics. They have, in fact, developed nicely into the webcomics equivalent of the People's Choice Awards. Which is actually a step up, since originally they aspired to be the webcomics equivalent of the MTV Movie Awards, with an ever-shifting host of fanboy categories like Best Female Character, Best Cameo, and Best School-Based Comic (no, really). The nadir may have been the year that Strongbad.com won despite not actually being a comic. It's taken eight years for the WCCAs to strip down to 18 technical and format categories (which is still too many, but at the height of the insanity there were 29) and convince people to occasionally nominate and vote for comics that aren't outright awful.

One thing about the WCCAs: it's extremely common for one or two comics to sweep the categories, probably because fans of a comic that's enjoying a popularity surge can easily turn out in force and stuff the virtual ballot boxes. This year the big winners were Tracy Butler's Lackadaisy (lackadaisy.foxprints.com), which also made out big in 2007, and Phil and Kaja Folio's Girl Genius (www.girlgeniusonline.com), signifying its official entrance into the ranks of the big boys.

I like Girl Genius, so this pleases me. As the creator of the second most successful online comic about a blonde, bespectacled female mad scientist, I admit I've sometimes harbored mixed feelings while watching it gather steam on its climb to nerd fame. But, hell, it's a good comic. And it got better after moving to the Web. When Girl Genius launched as a print comic, it was good, but a little slow and unfocused. The Foglios' three-page-a-week online schedule forced them to get faster and funnier, to make sure that something happens on every page. Heroine Agatha Heterodyne is currently infiltrating a huge, deadly, sapient mechanical castle, starting in the kitchen, while her OTP Gilgamesh Wulfenbach wages war outside the castle. (As a love interest, Gilgamesh has never really clicked for me, but at least he's got a cool name.) The Foglios don't waste time on anything that doesn't build either tension or humor. And Phil Foglio's art has grown lovely, with weird little details crammed into every corner.

I was also happy to see Templar, Arizona (www.templaraz.com), by Spike, pick up an award for Outstanding Character Writing. (There are separate categories for Writing and Character Writing. This is unnecessary, WCCAs. Similarly, Outstanding Artist, Black and White Art, Character Rendering, and Environment Design can all be replaced with Plain Damn Art.) It's gratifying that Templar has picked up a large and loyal following, because it's such an oddball comic. Basically, it's a travelogue set in a small city in an alternate-universe version of Arizona. Templar's world isn't radically different from ours, but the cultural detritus is alien: the TV shows, the fashions, the fast-food restaurants, the religious cults. There are characters—funny, scary, bizarre characters—but little in the way of a plot. It's exactly the type of comic that would have almost no chance if it had started in print: publishers wouldn't try to sell it, stores wouldn't order it, comic-book fans would gawp at it in confusion before passing on to something they recognized. On the Web, something like Templar has a fighting chance at finding an audience, which is one of the best things about webcomics.

Are there omissions in the WCCAs? You bet your ass. I want to see more love for Jenn Manley Lee's Dicebox (www.dicebox.net), one of the best comics currently running in any form, not to mention another comic that could probably only survive on the Web (it's a sprawling, full-color graphic novel, destined to be hundreds of pages long, about two itinerant female miners in outer space). Dylan Meconis' Family Man (at www.projectkooky.com), easily the most entertaining comic you're going to read about 18th-century Bavarian intellectuals and/or werewolves. Dorothy Gambrell's always brilliant Cat and Girl. Any number of the great comics on ModernTales.com, which I edit (gotta work a plug in there). And Chris Onstad's masterpiece Achewood picked up some nominations but no awards, and what is up with that?

Like any awards, the WCCAs don't boil down to much more than an abridged guide to some of the better hits in a particular field. You can't take seriously any award developed by the comics industry or people on the internet, and the WCCAs have the misfortune to be both. But looking at this year's nominees and winners reminds me of what I like about webcomics, and believe me, sometimes I need to be reminded.

Previous article: #10, Wondercon
Next article: #12, Little Lulu
Webliography
Your Webcomic Is Bad and You Should Feel Bad, John Solomon (badwebcomics.blogspot.com)

Shaenon K. Garrity is a manga editor at Viz Media and is best known for her webcomics Narbonic and Skin Horse.

All the Comics in the World is © Shaenon K. Garrity, 2008

 

Comments

spamboy (1 year ago)
 
In response to spamboy
Werd.
I thought of another category
OUTSTANDING RE-USE OF DIGITAL ASSETS
 
 
RKM0001 (1 year ago)
 
In response to spamboy
Thank you for proving mine and Eric's points.
 
 
spamboy (1 year ago)
 
I hadn't heard of the WCCAs before this article, and after checking them out... well its hard to take something seriously when their site looks like it was done in 1997.
After reading some of the award categories, I have another plus in the "not taking it seriously" category. I understand that they're "trying" but honestly "OUTSTANDING WEBSITE DESIGN" I'm glad to see that Scott Kurtz's PvP merited a nomination in this category, and not for anything else, while Penny Arcade had several nominations and wins (where's the award for "OUTSTANDING NON SEQUITOR HUMOR", cause Penny Arcade would definitely win for that). Granted PvP may not warrant any awards lately (sorry Scott, but you may have jumped the shark)
I have to agree with Shaenon, the WCCAs from an outside glance seem rather pathetic, but one thing they did do, was to introduce me to a list of new online comics I can check out.
And most award shows are generally based on the preference of the judges anyways, its the whole reason why Martin Scorsese won for "The Departed", and not for one of his good films. Mix that with how easy it is to game an online system (see "Pray for Death" at Zuda.com) and you end up with a rather cynical view of the WCCAs.
I mean, come on, "OUTSTANDING ENVIRONMENT DESIGN", are you kidding me? How bout a OUTSTANDING USE OF STICK FIGURES category.
I'll be curious to see the nominee's for next year, if Jeremy Love doesn't get nominated for Bayou (sorry for all the zuda plugs, but Jeremy is awesome) then, yes, the WCCAs are a joke.
XKCD won for OUTSTANDING SINGLE PANEL COMIC, but the link points to a multi-paneled comic... crazy.
 
 
Eric Burns (1 year ago)
 
I have to admit, this was a disheartening essay to read. The weakest of all arguments, in any critical discussion, is "this is not good, it is merely popular." It becomes the cornerstone of the counterargument -- the critic is useful only to critics, not to readers.
I didn't agree with all the WCCAs this year. Nor do I in any year. But all taste is innately subjective taste -- there are comics you vastly prefer which did not get nominated or win. There are comics you hate which have been honored now and in years past. That's true of anyone who has ever read a list of awards, in any medium.
But, if you're going to cover "All the comics in the world," you can't eschew the popular comics. And if a given comic, whether it mentions Super Smash Bros. or not, has built up a substantial readership, then someone out there finds it good.
Better, perhaps, than some of the comics you love.
John Solomon is an entertainer. He writes to his audience. That audience includes you, and you appreciate his entertainment. He says things that you've wished people would say for years, and so you feel a visceral reaction when you read it. If someone were going to be ridiculous enough to give fan-voted awards for webcomics reviews, you might vote for his blog, and so might a lot of other people. But Solomon is also loathed by plenty of people. If his reviews won an award, does that invalidate the award because they hate his stuff? Are they validated because you like it?
If you want to create a series award, with a broad cross section of experts in the field, that is juried and considered, go for it. I'd love to see it. But if you're going to have that award feel legitimate, you're going to need to gather experts from all over the continuum. It would be utterly correct for you, Joey Manley, Lea Hernandez and others to be there -- you guys know your stuff. But you should have the Halfpixel artists there too -- especially in the wake of their new book. You should have Gary Tyrell there. You should mine Dumbrella and Dayfree and independents like Randy Milholland and even Keenspotters like Jennie Breedan or J. Grant. The criteria can't be "people who like what I like" or you end up creating a masturbatory excess with less legitimacy than the WCCAs -- at least those don't have editorial bias.
The WCCAs need work. To their credit, they've clearly been trying to do so. But that work can't and shouldn't be "exclude the popular," even if you can't stand the popular comics.
(And as for Achewood? I'm as big an Achewood fan as anyone on the planet, but last year wasn't their strongest year. This year I have high hopes for -- there's been some really cool stuff so far.)
 
 
RKM0001 (1 year ago)
 
Where to begin?
First off, your reference to, "Your Webcomic Is Bad...." So, basically, since the majority of people in 2002 voted for Megatokya, the awards weren't valid? Or somehow wrong? Aside from my inability to take anything that blog says as the typical trolling for attention, it's shocking and a little embarrassing you hold that up as some sort of standard - that since it's a comic you don't like, it winning Best Writing is somehow "wrong."
This whole blog comes off as the typical whining about the WCCA I hear every year. It's a slightly more polite William G. complaint about popular comics winning and awards being a popularity contest, which is okay as long as the comics that are popular are YOUR favorites.
You're reminding me of the people who emailed me anytime Something*Positive won a WCCA, or was even nominated, to tell me I didn't deserve it because they didn't like my work. That's really pathetic, Shaenon. I expected better from you.
The WCCAs need a lot of work. I won't even pretend they don't. Some of their categories don't make sense and there seems to be a lot of confusion on how things are run, and poor execution in a lot of areas. But griping because the majority of people not liking and nominating/voting for the comics you think are great doesn't help anyone.
 
 

Would you like to comment?

Join comiXology for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Latest Articles

  • The Day NASCAR Killed Comix (And Other Tales) – 18 hours ago
  • I Like It!... But Is It Comics? – 21 hours ago
  • The Sausage Factory – 2 days ago
  • Batman Did a Bad Thing in 1943 – 4 days ago
  • The Fan Who Got Away – 1 week ago
  • Advanced Common Sense – 1 week ago
  • Like High School Redux – 1 week ago
  • You Have to Get Paid: Lessons in Freelancing – 2 weeks ago
  • Shaenon's Half-Assed Guide to Comic Book Message Boards – 2 weeks ago
  • Seriously Dweeb, Where's The Spandex? – 2 weeks ago

Latest Interviews

  • Interview with Top Cow Pilot Season 2008 Winners – 9 months ago
  • Interview with Fluorescent Black creators Fox, Wilson, and Cox: Part Two – 9 months ago
  • Interview with Fluorescent Black creators Fox, Wilson, and Cox: Part One – 10 months ago
  • Interview with Brandon Carter of Toasted Coconut Media – 1 year ago
  • Interview with the creators of "Jenna Jameson: Shadow Hunter" – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Batton Lash – 1 year ago
  • Interview with TJ Behe and Phil Elliott – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Peter Simeti of Alterna Comics – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Ron Perazza of Zuda Comics – 1 year ago
  • Interview with James Turner – 1 year ago

Latest Podcasts

  • Some New Kind of Slaughter with A. David Lewis – 5 days ago
  • Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? with Ian Brill – 1 week ago
  • Dark Reign: Zodiac with Nathan Fox – 2 weeks ago
  • Atomic Robo with Brian Clevinger and Scott Wegener – 3 weeks ago
  • Elephantmen with Richard Starkings – 1 month ago
  • Bayou with Jeremy Love – 1 month ago
  • Tim Sievert – 1 month ago
  • Capt'n Eli with Jay Piscopo – 1 month ago
  • Chris Giarrusso – 2 months ago
  • Karen Green – 2 months ago
 
About Us  |  FAQ  |  Copyright Notices  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Ad Specs  |  iPhone  |  Podcast  |  Retailers  |  Contact Us