Sign Up  |  Help  |  Log In
Monday, November 23, 2009. New Comics in 2 days
 
 
The Day NASCAR Killed Comix (And Other Tales)
By Valerie D'Orazio
Friday July 3, 2009 12:00:00 pm
I decided to try an experiment where a lot of the topics I planned to blog about during the week -- but was too crazed schedule-wise to get to -- I post here. A catch-all of controversy, musings, and personal ephemera. Let's give it a shot, shall we?

First they came for my Supergirl knicker collection, then my Alan Moore


Technically, if a group of people pressure a comics publisher to not publish art or images of a certain prurient nature, and said publisher capitulates: does that mean that censorship has won? Or is the high-brow or low-brow nature of the art in question a factor? I believe that in the comics industry, some advocates for free speech remain conveniently silent when Supergirl's knickers are successfully covered up. Are there no tears shed for Supergirl's thong among those passionate advocates for our innate rights to self-expression? How about from the crowd who says they are so hyped about freedom of expression, they would even defend the rights of neo-Nazis to have free speech? The buck stops at so-called "trashy" comix. Oh, I'm sorry: comics, not comix. If it was "comix," then that would be different.

Not that I care, I'm just playing devil's advocate. Whatever floats your boat is fine with me. Especially if it Twitter trends.

The Day NASCAR Killed Comics


I love when pundits insinuate that because a webcomic is sponsored by a major publisher, it is somehow not a "real" webcomic. I love the controversy surrounding the Harvey Awards nominations, because it brings the topic of what is and what is not "art" in comics to the fore, and along with it people's prejudices. Not that I don't believe in one being a discerning comic book aficionado. But I think there were no bigger instigating factors regarding the public outcry over the noms than two facts: 1) NASCAR is a red state icon, and 2) Zuda is owned by DC "Cue The Imperial Guard Theme Music" Comics.

"WE NEED TO CANCEL THE HARVEY AWARDS BECAUSE NASCAR WAS NOMINATED!"

I mean, holy crap. I love that. Can we do that for all nominations that we don't like? I wanted to do that when I was a little kid and Gandhi got the Oscar instead of E.T. I was really pissed off. I loved that f**king animatronic puppet.

You know what was considered low-brow entertainment back in the day? E.C. Comics.

You know, what I don't get sometimes is how the E.C. Comics horror line could be seen as so edgy and modern now when they were basically your old standard blood-and-guts fire-and-brimstone morality plays. I used to wonder if it was possible to make a comic or a movie that is both highly gory and moralistic. Yes, and yes. I saw this cheap direct-to-something movie the other day that was like boobies, boobies, blood, and intestines more than halfway through, and then became really moral towards the end. Complete with a busload of Jesus Camp children. I kid you not.

Anyway, I'm up for creating a new comic book award: The Liefelds. But it doesn't award best comic book talent. Instead, the Liefelds are given to those bloggers and pundits who can come up with the best bitching about comics that they think suck and are beneath them. I mean, truly epic bitching. I have stuff to submit for this year, perhaps from this very column. I'm also up for the morality play about the busload of Jesus Camp children. I'm very versatile.

Wing-Head Versus The Boy Scout


I'm really hyped for Independence Day, but I don't want to seem like a yahoo about it. I don't want to seem passé or hopelessly unhip. I mean, even GI Joe has dumped the "Real American Hero" angle in that new movie that's coming out. And I heard that's really working out well for them.

The truth is, if you go out on a blog and say: THANK GOD FOR AMMMMMMERICA and stuff like that, some people think you're a yahoo, ascribe to you all sorts of sinister agendas. The only one who really can get away with it is Captain America. I sincerely think that's the last stars-and-stripes icon that doesn't provoke immediate derision among the cognoscenti. I think ol' Cap is less bashed by the postmodernist comic book writer than Superman is. Both stand for the Red, White, and Blue. Literally. But why do the deconstructors of our childhood mythologies hate on Superman just a bit more?

Notable: I have no photo of Rocky Balboa on my wall, but I do have one of Apollo Creed in that full red-white-and-blue Uncle Sam boxing outfit with the top-hat. I have it next to Tony Manero from "Saturday Night Fever" and Nosferatu.

"Zowie, She's Gay!"


Wow, there are still new mainstream online news outlets finding out about "Lesbian Batwoman" after how many years? What can you say, the story's got legs. And the rest of her isn't too bad either (Ed McMahon: hahahaha).

Does that sound kinda offensive to you? "Lesbian Batwoman?" That's pretty much the tone of the majority of these news stories: "LESBIAN BATWOMAN!!!!" In one of those articles, Greg Rucka was described as "growling" when asked about the lesbian angle. He was so offended about any insinuation that the lesbianism was a gimmick, or that it was being used as a selling point, that he was described as growling. That was a very dramatic moment in the history of LGBTs in comics. I think we've come very far.

DC's shocked (simply shocked!) that the media is picking up on the lesbian angle. And more than shocked, they are dismayed and embarrassed. That was not what they meant to happen at ALL.

The most refreshing thing I've ever seen was a movie where there was a gay main character and nobody made a big deal about it. You may not have heard of this film. I think that's the point.

Oh, the fine line we have to walk between promotion and excess. But we have to walk it, don't we?

Marathon


Last Sunday I think I wrote the best thing I've ever done in my life. Finished the entire project in one day, 12 hours straight. Given the scope of the project, that was way too intense a time-frame to pack it in. But I just couldn't stop. It frightened me, because I wrote it and I felt like: this is it. Like all these years I worked and worked just to get to the point where I committed this particular thing to paper.

Wouldn't you like to know what it is? Maybe, one day, I will tell you.

Like I said, it's a fine line. ;-)

And This Has Been...


You can check me out at Occasional Superheroine!
Thrill to my tweets on Twitter!
Email me complements, tips, and awesome gossip I probably can't print at valerie dot dorazio at gmail dot com!
And buy my eBook Memoirs of An Occasional Superheroine via Paypal!

Valerie D'Orazio is a former editor at DC Comics, is presently president of the Friends of Lulu and is probably best known as the Occasional Superheroine

Comics-Op is ©2009 Valerie D'Orazio

 

Comments

Illustr8r (4 months ago)
 
"WE NEED TO CANCEL THE HARVEY AWARDS BECAUSE NASCAR WAS NOMINATED!"
Who's the idiot who said that? Is their homeowner's insurance paid up, or are they still living with Mommy and Daddy?
 
 
Shannon Smith (4 months ago)
 
For the record. I'm a pinko liberal commie ass socialist democrat and I loves me some NASCAR. (Never read a panel of that comic though. I was at a convention where those guys were guests but nothing about the book really called out to me to pick it up. In other news, I'm pretty sure Ditko drew a Richard Petty comic once. In other other news, I'm pretty sure Richard Petty and Stan Lee are the same person.)
 
 
Joe Willy (4 months ago)
 
I think pretending people were attacking the NASCAR comic "just" because it's a NASCAR comic is like the people who pretend Sarah Palin gets attacked by the media because she's a woman. Sure, there may have been a person or two who did that but by and large the rest had other reasons (which I think Pal DeBenedetto nails well enough that I won't bother). Also, I think the complaints about the Zuda nominations were that they were done in awards that sounded like they should be for printed material or that there "should" be a distinction between awards for print and web. It had ZERO to do with DC from anything I can see and had more to do with thinking the Harveys should distinguish between print and web the way the Oscars have a separate category for short film, documentaries, etc. (no matter which category I picked someone will take that as a slight against web comics which it isn't- they're just different).
Everyone pretends the Oscars only nominate snobby films when really the Oscars nominate films that are manipulative pap masquerading as snobby films. The comics industry doesn't even bother trying to dress up its award winners as high brow- it just gives the awards to the pap and tells everyone who objects they must have some hidden agenda (like hating DC or NASCAR or whatever this column is trying to say).
 
 
Pal DeBenedetto (4 months ago)
 
I guess the NASCAR thing probably wouldn't bother me (or anyone) as much if i'd seen one reputable blog or comics review site that A. reviewed it and B. gave it a glowing review. Neither of those scenarios seems to exist, and it's not like it's because the book was 100% off of everyone's radar; hell, the Muppet Show comic is the best reviewed book of the year. If it's good it bubbles to the top. Now I don't mind the "well, you guys haven't read it so don't knock it" argument, but I've never once heard any of those people say they did read it, and that it was worthy of any recognition.
Look, I've never read it, and I admittedly dismiss it, just as I would a Wal-Mart sponsored comic, or a free Toys-R-Us comic about Geoffrey the Giraffe. If I get called ignorant that's fine by me, but be serious; we all know it's bad, even the ones who have defended its nomination. This isn't to take anything away from nominees like Frank Quitely or Ed Brubaker, or even the Zuda folks, who I feel all deserve nominations based on merit alone; but I read the NASCAR FCBD book and it was laughably bad. I can not imagine this single issue being any better.
You can call it bitching and whining I guess-- there's been plenty of that over the past few days, from both sides of the fence-- but are the complaints worse than the lack of complaints, worse than those who see the NASCAR nomination, know that it's clearly wrong, and fall back on the "you can't judge a book by its cover" platitude? I believe the complaints are valid, and the outrage shows not that some people think they're "above" certain kinds of comics, but that people actually care about these awards.
 
 
dbspira (4 months ago)
 
I think the Batwoman lesbian story seems like a bigger deal to the outside world because of the undying belief that comics are for kids.
That being said, I too am pretty sick of DC's "shock."
 
 
eric.owens (4 months ago)
 
I guess I'll reply section to each section separately:
1. I'm glad Supergirl got shorts because it seems to fit the character better in my opinion. It wouldn't make sense to put shorts on under evil Mary Marvel's skirt, but would make sense for good Mary Marvel to wear them, just to give another example. If someone wants to see scantily clad superheroines, there are plenty of other options. If one must see Supergirl in a thong, that's what commissioned art is for.
2. I haven't read NASCAR Heroes, but I don't see what the big deal is. If it's good, then it should be recognized. From what I could gather, it's a book about a team of super-powered people with different skills and personalities coming together to achieve a common goal. Wasn't that basically the pitch for the Avengers? It's taking a common theme and applying it to a different genre. It sounds more engaging than watching an actual race. Frankly, I think we need more variety in comics if we want to pull in new readers and a book about racing seems like a good start. Whatever your interest, there should be (and probably is if you look hard enough) a comic about that. It seems to work in Japan.
I don't know what the complaint about Zuda is, so I can't comment too much on that. I just started checking out Zuda and I like it, especially High Moon and Night Owls. I don't see why comics of that quality shouldn't be allowed to compete. High Moon especially just seems like a regular comic book that happens to be online instead of paper (for now).
3. I think the hating on Superman has to do with his status. Cap isn't quite as famous a character as Superman and he's basically just a guy who's above average. Superman is a better-known character and his abilities have been ludicrously over the top at times. He gives people more to work with. Because he's been held up as some type of Platonic ideal, he's going to be a bigger target for people to attempt to tear down. At least that's my view as someone who used to bash Superman, but now really appreciates the character after spending some time in contemplation. I think I understand him now.
4. Yup, Batwoman is a lesbian. I don't see it as being a huge part of the book in the long run as it's already getting praised for other reasons. Sadly, I'm not sure there would be a way to create a lesbian lead like that without people making a bid deal about it. If it's addressed right away, then it comes off as a gimmick to get hype early on. If it doesn't come up until later, it seems like a cheap stunt to boost sales. I don't blame Rucka for that, though. That's on the public. DC can't really be surprised that the media is playing it up, though they don't seem to have the hype machine that Marvel has.
5. Congratulations on the marathon session and completing your project. Whatever it is, I'm sure it's excellent.
 
 

Would you like to comment?

Join comiXology for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Latest Articles

  • Advanced Common Sense Episode 6 – 2 days ago
  • New Atom Angel – 4 days ago
  • Two by Tashlin – 6 days ago
  • 22 Ways of Looking at a Sheep – 1 week ago
  • It's So Dark Every Time I Shove My Head Up Here – 1 week ago
  • All the Comics in the World: Zot!1 week ago
  • That He Loves: Bread & Wine1 week ago
  • Panels in the Ivory Towers – 2 weeks ago
  • The Manga Cargo Cult: How Manga Got Long (and Short Again) – 3 weeks ago
  • Phil & John – 3 weeks ago

Latest Interviews

  • Interview with Top Cow Pilot Season 2008 Winners – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Fluorescent Black creators Fox, Wilson, and Cox: Part Two – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Fluorescent Black creators Fox, Wilson, and Cox: Part One – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Brandon Carter of Toasted Coconut Media – 1 year ago
  • Interview with the creators of "Jenna Jameson: Shadow Hunter" – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Batton Lash – 1 year ago
  • Interview with TJ Behe and Phil Elliott – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Peter Simeti of Alterna Comics – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Ron Perazza of Zuda Comics – 2 years ago
  • Interview with James Turner – 2 years ago

Latest Podcasts

  • Pope Hats with Ethan Rilly – 16 hours ago
  • Jesus Hates Zombies with Stephen Lindsay – 1 week ago
  • Doris Danger: Giant Monster Adventures with Chris Wisnia – 2 weeks ago
  • Fallen Angel: Reborn with Peter David and J.K. Woodward – 3 weeks ago
  • Spartacus: Blood and Sand with Josh Blaylock – 4 weeks ago
  • Bartholomew of the Scissors with Daniel Crosier – 1 month ago
  • Scarlett Takes Manhattan with Molly Crabapple and John Leavitt – 1 month ago
  • Serena Valentino – 1 month ago
  • Driven by Lemons with Joshua Cotter – 2 months ago
  • Sulk with Jeffrey Brown – 2 months ago
 
About Us  |  FAQ  |  Copyright Notices  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Ad Specs  |  iPhone  |  Podcast  |  Retailers  |  Contact Us