Sign Up  |  Help  |  Log In
Monday, November 23, 2009. New Comics in 2 days
 
 
A Warning Label I'd Be Happy To See
By Tucker Stone
Wednesday March 4, 2009 11:00:00 pm
In case you haven't noticed, your friendly neighborhood Ship Captain is doing double duty this week, with my screeching tones playing harmonically alongside the likes of Jeff Parker and Tom Fowler, who stopped by to waste a portion of their life talking to me at the recent New York Comic Con. Thankfully, we stuck to discussing their work on their creator-owned comic Mysterius the Unfathomable published by Wildstorm and steered clear of discussing things we might have argued about, like whether lead is a good vitamin for babies or why I prefer my tuna not to be dolphin safe.

If you haven't listened to it, you really should—not because I'm interesting, let me guarantee you brother, I am not—but because both Parker and Fowler are open and honest artists working in a medium that usually prefers its creators to speak at length mostly about information easily available in Diamond's solicitations catalog. They've got stuff to say, and they say it well.

My favorite part of the interview was where Jeff and Tom started talking about the portion of their contract that specifies that any communication regarding Mysterius with the book's editor, Ben Abernathy, has to be circulated among all of them. Since neither men work in some sweatshop office from the roaring 20's, that just means all emails have to be cc'ed to the other two, regardless of content. Maybe it's a question for Jeff, maybe a note for Tom: either way, everybody involved in the project knows about it.

Now, I didn't find this particularly interesting in and of itself—as the idea was being described, I remember thinking to myself "Well sure, that's expected." After all, if you're working in a medium like comics, a medium that is wholly dependent on words and images working in tandem with each other, then of course you're going to need the writer and artist to talk to each other. That's obvious, right?

Apparently not. If you heard the interview, you'll notice that Jeff Parker assumes the opposite. He assumes that I, regular comic reader and sometimes comic blogger, "wouldn't be surprised" to find out how this isn't always the case. That sometimes an artist does have questions about the script, but these questions get filtered through an editor who decides—for whatever imaginable reason—not to mention them to the creator on the other side of the comic construction fence.

I'll be totally honest. I have always assumed that there was less interplay between the creative team when companies like DC or Marvel were dealing with books that need to be pushed through quickly, books that end up with a credits page listing multiple inkers and two or more pencil artists. Sure, I figure those books don't have as much background conversation, since most of the time they're deadline books. But otherwise, the idea that a comic book's artist or writer could end up watching a work that has their name on it get shuffled off to a printing press or the Adobe coloring lab without them having a chance to discuss a problem, concern or question regarding the basic mechanics of the comic?

That's completely absurd.

I'm sorry, but for me, this has to be the most ridiculous thing I've heard about comics in a while. A comic book isn't just a little dependent on the interplay of word and image. It's wholly dependent. I don't claim any high comprehension of aesthetics, but I've read enough comics to know that they're a hell of a lot more than just some words tacked on a picture, and when a work is in the position of having two different individuals responsible for those two necessary parts, those two integral pieces from which all other aspects of its place as art stem from, I'd wager good money that communication between the two is an intensely important part of the collaboration.

It would be the height of folly for me to extrapolate a huge criticism out of Parker's statement—he didn't specify any creator, publisher or comic, and I can't imagine he would have done so if I'd thought to press him on it at the time. Our conversation was about Mysterius, and that's what we wanted to talk about. And since then, I've already turned that statement into an excuse and acclaim for my own reasons—in my mind, comics I don't like are automatically getting filed in an imaginary box called "no communication books" whereas works I do enjoy, respect and admire—works like Criminal, freaking-shut-up-already Watchmen and B.P.R.D.—are getting placed alongside Mysterius as comics I feel confident are definite artist/writer collaborations.

Yeah, I'm doing that, and it's completely subjective. Here's the thing about that: I don't know if that's in the slightest bit true. I don't know, and neither do the majority of people reading these things—we don't know if these comics are getting stamped out as if they were a burrito mailed around the country to get filled with its various constituent parts.

There's no real way for me to tell how much of a disservice this does to the reader, the idea that some comic books get put together like this. I don't know if comics I like get made like this, and I don't know if comics I find distasteful aren't.

The only real thing it says is this: any editor or publisher who contributes or participates in this sort of condemnation of the artistic collaboration that creates a form of comics? Any writer or artist who sits back and allows their half of a project, their work, to be treated like this? Anybody who looks at the questions of one of the two primary forces behind what turns a comic into something more than a book of words and pictures?

They're the ones that people should be upset with when it comes time to get worked up about something. More so than any comics naysayer who criticizes the medium as juvenile trash, more so than any unsuspecting mother who throws out a dog-eared collection of Frank Miller's Born Again series, more so than any emotionally twisted comics blogger, more so than any financially weak distribution system—those people are the enemies of this art form, and those people are the ones who are actively destroying the potential that comics could, and should have.

People like that. They'll send this art form into the sewers of oblivion and they'll tell you it's in your best interest while it happens.

Don't believe them for a second.

Tucker Stone's writing may be found in print in Comic Foundry and online at The Factual Opinion, where he frequently reviews new releases.

This Ship Is Totally Sinking is © Tucker Stone, 2008

 

Comments

Pal DeBenedetto (8 months ago)
 
McCloud talks about this in Understanding Comics; where a writer on a book goes off and hones his craft on his own, and the artist does the same, and then at the end they just throw it together. And yeah the writing may be engrossing and interesting, and the art might look nice, but just "tacking words onto a picture" as you said turns the whole project into a muddled mess. But at least now we have an explanation for the past six years of "Superman/Batman".
 
 
klg19 (8 months ago)
 
This really IS shocking, and indefensible. I'm so used to discussions about the nature of collaboration (Haspiel and Ames, the Tamaki cousins), that it would never have occurred to me that that wasn't the norm.
This really is crazy, and an incredible disservice to the fans.
 
 
Joe Willy (8 months ago)
 
I have a 7 year old son. We often read comics together. He loves them. But it is totally sad how many times I actually have to stop and explain to him what's happening because the artist made the storytelling so muddled, unclear or downright confusing that I know he's going to miss an important detail. Also, I find TONS of spelling and grammatical errors (and I'm not a sentence-diagrammer who knows about past-perfect tense and all that). Sometimes he even points out stupid errors like when an old lady's hair went from orange to white in the space of a page or a recent Spider-Man comic when the plot relied on Spidey being wet but it made no sense HOW he'd gotten wet! I know this all seems off-topic, but every time this happens I think to myself- if the editors are not looking at THIS stuff, then what ARE they doing for their checks. Now I know. Thanks, Tucker.
 
 
Powerwolf (8 months ago)
 
As someone who's trying to break into comics, the only words I can find for this are "!@#$ed up" and "terrifying." I know that if some jackass filtered out any of the things my artist said to me in terms of questions about changing panel layout or script-and you're correct in the assumption that communication is REALLY IMPORTANT, just so you know-I would be absolutely livid and I don't know how the comic would approach readability. That's utterly outrageous.
 
 

Would you like to comment?

Join comiXology for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Latest Articles

  • Advanced Common Sense Episode 6 – 3 days ago
  • New Atom Angel – 4 days ago
  • Two by Tashlin – 6 days ago
  • 22 Ways of Looking at a Sheep – 1 week ago
  • It's So Dark Every Time I Shove My Head Up Here – 1 week ago
  • All the Comics in the World: Zot!1 week ago
  • That He Loves: Bread & Wine1 week ago
  • Panels in the Ivory Towers – 2 weeks ago
  • The Manga Cargo Cult: How Manga Got Long (and Short Again) – 3 weeks ago
  • Phil & John – 3 weeks ago

Latest Interviews

  • Interview with Top Cow Pilot Season 2008 Winners – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Fluorescent Black creators Fox, Wilson, and Cox: Part Two – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Fluorescent Black creators Fox, Wilson, and Cox: Part One – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Brandon Carter of Toasted Coconut Media – 1 year ago
  • Interview with the creators of "Jenna Jameson: Shadow Hunter" – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Batton Lash – 1 year ago
  • Interview with TJ Behe and Phil Elliott – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Peter Simeti of Alterna Comics – 1 year ago
  • Interview with Ron Perazza of Zuda Comics – 2 years ago
  • Interview with James Turner – 2 years ago

Latest Podcasts

  • Pope Hats with Ethan Rilly – 17 hours ago
  • Jesus Hates Zombies with Stephen Lindsay – 1 week ago
  • Doris Danger: Giant Monster Adventures with Chris Wisnia – 2 weeks ago
  • Fallen Angel: Reborn with Peter David and J.K. Woodward – 3 weeks ago
  • Spartacus: Blood and Sand with Josh Blaylock – 4 weeks ago
  • Bartholomew of the Scissors with Daniel Crosier – 1 month ago
  • Scarlett Takes Manhattan with Molly Crabapple and John Leavitt – 1 month ago
  • Serena Valentino – 1 month ago
  • Driven by Lemons with Joshua Cotter – 2 months ago
  • Sulk with Jeffrey Brown – 2 months ago
 
About Us  |  FAQ  |  Copyright Notices  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Ad Specs  |  iPhone  |  Podcast  |  Retailers  |  Contact Us